I’m on a online discussion forum called YoungPRPRos. We recently had someone ask if anyone has had a hard time working with Wikipedia editors in getting a entry approved. In the email query to all of us, she described the editors as being “Nazis”. She did so because they had described the entry she wrote as being over promotional. She insisted this wasn’t the case…that it was neutral that the accusation was unfair.

So I suggested that she send us the links to the entry. She complied, I clicked through and found a very promotional piece. Not even close. Basically it was copy that you would see in an online bio from a company website or a bio written for a speaker program.

The entry is greeted with the following:

This article or section is written like an advertisement.Ha.

Read more…

From the chronicles of what is both silly and serious comes the current battle for what former U.S. Senator, television and movie actor, and U.S. presidential candidate Fred Thompson is called on his Wikipedia entry.

Apparently, he was born “Freddie Dalton Thompson”, a name he has not changed. He is known nowadays as either Fred Thompson or Fred Dalton Thompson. That’s fine.

Now, on Wikipedia, there is a small battle going on between a woman named Tvoz, who is determined to enter “Freddie Dalton Thompson” and a Thompson supporter named Ferrylodge who wants it to be “Fred Dalton Thompson. Tvoz, who happens to be a Democrat, is insisting that the information be accurate while Ferrylodge believes that using Freddie makes Thompson sound silly.

I remember reading a long time ago that many of the most edited bios were of elected representatives. Capitol Hill staffers were constantly going at it, praising their own and attacking their opponents.

Shows me that there’s a lot of peons in politics.

I’ll think I’ll now edit Thompson’s page the way I think it should be. Wonder how long it will stay that way.

Update:  Tvoz has rightfully responded and pointed out that while I mentioned that she is a self-declared Democrat, I failed to mention that Ferrylodge is an actual Thompson supporter.

I also should point out that as I went over to the article to edit it, I saw that it had been “agreed upon” but the editors to leave it as is.  So I didn’t touch it.  For the record, I felt that if he was born Freddie and hadn’t changed it, then he should be called that.

And, Tvoz, I agree with your motives more than Ferrylodge.  Didn’t consider you to be a peon.

So I came across this article, Wikipedia Spin Doctors Revealed, Wikipedia Spin Doctors Revealed, via my google news feed.

I find this an interesting idea of creating accountability through “knowing” who the editors are. On one level I think this flies in the face of the wikipedia system of somewhat anonymous editing. It raises some questions about conversational marketing - trying to track back who started a conversation. Does this change the value of a conversation knowing who started it? What if you don’t like the person or feel they have a vested interest in spinning the conversation?

I think that this is part of the change that is happening on the web - the accountability issue. Or the loss of anonymity on the web. This in part has been pushed to the fore by our governments efforts at getting internet companies to divulge their customers information, the tracking of their online movements and explorations. It is a truly interesting debate that raises all kinds of questions of privacy, liberty and state security. However openness is always more valuable in the long run then closed systems or conversations - at least that is my cursory thought.

It is always the danger of the minority (the spoilers) spoiling it for the majority (the non-spoilers).

Although links from Wikipedia result in traffic and new users, figuring out the culture of Wikis – and Wikipedia specifically – is a much larger document. Suffice it to say that in most cases, openly and generously contributing to a Wiki is a very powerful way to become an influencer in a very influential web resource. Directly promoting your company or adding your company entry always results in very negative blowback. I have made all the mistakes and have had a lot of great successes as well. Wikipedia isn’t a wilderness, it is heavily guarded and has a very strict protocol you can learn more about.