On Monday, CBS Television Stations announced the launch of what I think will be a great step in the direction of web based mainstream and citizen generated news. They are launching the CBS Local Ad Network in which local stations will syndicate new content to local bloggers and social media sites. This news will be delivered via news widgets that will link to video and text news of the local stations.

IN exchange for hosting the widgets, the bloggers will receive a share of the local ad dollars that are sold by the station.

How is it a win-win-win-win situation?

The will extend the CBS news media brand both on a national and local level by integrating news content with local blogger with a following. While it takes some of the focus off the broadcast model, it could potentially easily be made up via web usage. The network will seem innovative while the local affiliate could develop deeper ties to the local community. Bloggers and social networkds could increase their visibility and bring in more traffic. Advertisers will get greater exposure.

I like the idea.





Yeah, I know. You hate commercials. You hate the sudden interruption of your favorite show to see three, four, or five thirty-second poorly created hard-to-differentiate video presentations on a product you don’t like, don’t want, don’t need, or don’t use.

Me too.

You want to get back to the show, the game, the newscast. See the bad guy get his ass nailed, the final two minutes of the tight game, or news on the latest scoop on the election cycle. The last thing you want to see is a series of presentations about pills that can make you pee better, a car that supposedly makes you cool, and a law firm that chases ambulances.

Me too.

But every once and a while, you’ll watch something that will catch your eye. It will make you laugh. Chuckle inside. You’ll be able to relate to it. Or you’ll be impressed because it’s impressive, not because the commercial is trying to pretend that it’s impressive with itself. Or you’ll think, shit, how did they do that?

Me too.

If that’s what happens, then that’s a commercial that will likely end up on Firebrand.

Read more…

Two articles caught my eye earlier this week.

One was an AdAge article entitled “So Much for Engagement; Buys Are Still Based on Eyes”. It talked about a recent study by Advertiser Perceptions. Marketers and media buyers are looking to spend more and more dollars online. That’s because their first and foremost metric is reach - and that’s were people are going today. Online. But they see it more as a results oriented medium and are not doing it for engagement purposes as they don’t perceive that the online is good for engagement. This study was based on a survey of 2047 marketers and their media buyers.

The second one was a press release of a report put out by the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Council. It described how measurable ROI is becoming an increasingly important factor for marketers as they transform dollars online. Accountabilty is of prime importance as marketers look to measure the value of the programs they’ve created and the investments they’ve made. A result of this trend in 2007 was the relative high turnover of the agencies used - ad, web design, and PR - to carry out these programs. The reasons for the severing of relationships was often tied into “lack of innovation” and “no value-added thinking”. Hmm…

Read more…

A & H cohort Saul Wainwright has reacted with skepticism and a touch of disdain to the recent Deloitte & Touche survey that declares that American consumers feel that television advertising has the effect on buying habits.

85 percent of consumers still find TV advertising to have the most impact on their buying habits, but online ads are second-best, with 65 percent of consumers saying they have the most impact, beating out magazines, at 63 percent.

He then goes on to point out that many Americans are joining social networks and that they seek out information online about product and services. They often turn to others online to get this information.

He asks, “TV Advertising still packs the biggest wallop?? Really?

My answer: ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY

Why should this be a surprise? And why is this always looked upon as a competition? It shouldn’t be because the most effective marketing strategies today usually call for an integrated approach.

Here’s some explanations as to why this survey is likely very accurate.

- As Saul himself points out, the fact that TV is ingrained in the mind of so many may make it an easy answer spew out. That leads to reason #2.

- TV is ingrained in the mind of so many. It is very much part of many people’s lives. Sure, they’re watching it less and less. But they’re more likely to own a TV before they own a computer. And yes, they’re still likely to own a computer. And be online.

- The days of passive media digestion is NOT over. It’s still here. It will continue to be here. It’s just not the ONLY game in town.

- TV can give people ‘inadvertent exposure” to products, services, events. People don’t have to be looking for it to find it.

- When it comes to local, many smaller localized companies have yet to develop an online strategy. But they may run a spot on cable.

- Not everyone is under 40 or online enthusiasts. Yep, there’s a lot of people out there that check their email every couple of weeks. If that.

- and perhaps most importantly, those online conversations aren’t advertising. They, more often than not, aren’t marketing. They are organic conversations. That’s why they work!

To me, the most compelling figure up there is not the 85 percent that say TV. It’s the 65 percent that say online ads. If one puts together that 65% and then adds in the concept of genuine social media, you’ll see a true profile of the online world and where it really stands.

Deloitte & Touche released a new survey about the changes in media consumption. You can check out the survey on ZDNet.com

The survey is packed full of all kinds of interesting statistics. But it is this stat that caught my eye:

“85 percent of consumers still find TV advertising to have the most impact on their buying habits, but online ads are second-best, with 65 percent of consumers saying they have the most impact, beating out magazines, at 63 percent”.

It seems a little weird that people are spending more and more time on other devices such as cell phones and computers and increasing amount of time in social networks and other such spaces, yet according to this survey, TV continues to influence the buying habits of consumers.

Why is this? Is it that TV is just where we are used to getting our buying information from? Is it the way that these adverts are designed and crafted? Or, are we just not fully aware of how much the internet is influencing our buying habits?

My hunch is that people assume that they are getting their information from TV. The influence of different marketing mediums is so new I think that we are only just beginning to understand their impact on our decisions. I know that for me I get the majority of my information from the web and from conversations from my buddies. In fact most of the people in my circle don’t even really watch TV - but we all hang out on the web and hear about products through our conversations. Yeah, I think this part of the survey is not accurate. I think it misses the mark and obviously is not asking the right questions.

Even if I am off the mark I think that this second set of statistics is crucially important to the importance of conversational marketing in the social media realm:

“54 percent of consumers said they socialize via social-networking sites, chat rooms, or message boards, and 45 percent said they maintain a profile on a social-networking site”.

More and more people are interacting with this realm where regular advertising has very little traction. People don’t read banner ads or pay attention to little flashing (and quite frankly annoying) ads. What they are paying attention to is the conversation - the conversation with friends and between groups of people.

Ultimately the questions asked are: What are people talking about? What are they using? Who is using it and what do they think of the product. The passive reception of information is over. Consumers want recommendations, influence and the ability to give and receive feedback. They want to be part of the conversation not the passive receivers of information.

This is happening in the social media realm: in message boards, blogs and social networking sites. And these spaces are growing exponentially. More and more people actively participate in them. And, quite frankly, I am not sure that this survey really taps into the impact of this type of conversation and the influence on our decisions.

I am looking forward to surveys that actually work at measuring the influence of these conversations.

One thing is certain, the media landscape is undergoing major reconfiguration!!