Eric Schonfeld of TechCrunch poses the question as to whether Google Trend result will be a good predictor of the 2008 presidential election. He points to past statistics that show a relative symmetry between searches for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and the results for the Democratic primary.null

Blue = Barack Obama Red = John McCain

I think you can take all this with a grain of salt. Sure, there will be some relevance, but there are too many other factors involved that could skew the results. There are also a bunch of unrelated factors that can’t be prescribed to online search.

The electoral college is the deciding factor in elections and while you can break down searched by state, each state will have its own factors relating to voters and internet usage. And voters will vary as to how they get their political information. Evangelical voters will differ from young urban single people who will differ from Latinos who will differ from suburban housewives.

How thiis wold be helpful is to also measure terms such as health care, immigration, tax policy, and Iraq…and match them with each candidate. Better yet, match them by candidate and state. You’ll start to see what issues are important where.

Candidates then should create issue focused minisites that can directly address a candidates interests.

Hopefully, campaign advisors will look to do this as opposed to primarily run on slogans and attack ads that teach us very little.

So, when organized crime, gambling, and prostitution are removed from Second Life, will there be anything left? Patry’s over, Second Lifers. Wilderness turns into cul-de-sac muy rapido these days. No more wild west Second Life any more. Know when to walk away and know when to run.

“Gambling, along with virtual sex, has been one of the popular pastimes in the virtual world. British Second Life user Anthony Smith told Information Week, a technology trade magazine, that he spent 1 million “Linden dollars” — about $3,800 in real currency — building his virtual casino.” Via the Washington Post.

I guess if you want to get your freak on, you still must crowd into the cabin of a jet and head out to sin city, Las Vegas, to get your freak on. Sorry, Second Lifers.

I love Second Life as an idea because I love Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. And, as a geek, I love the metaverse, too. I am also a marketer and I don’t like Second Life for marketing. Why? Second Life Marketing has only one life, and for many clients, that only life is in the novelty of being the first Fortune 50 company to “go there.”

“The only problem for marketers? Second Life is a pretty worthless place to try and sell people on your company’s brand and products. Wired gives a laundry list of drawbacks, but the biggest is that very few people actually use Second Life.” Via Tech Dirt via Wired.

There is no there, there. And, once you set up shop on Second Life, there is only one life to it: once you stop paying into it, it goes away. I am also no good at it, so what’s the use. I know folks who rock the Second Life promotional campaign like wild.

Read more…