U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton may have opened up a Pandora’s box.

Last year, Viacom, the owner of  such major cable networks as Black Entertainment Television, MTV, VH1, Comedy Central, and Nickelodeon, sued YouTube and Google because YouTube, through it’s uploading system, was allowing it users to upload Viacom copyrighted videos.  YouTube was profiting from this as it increased its audience and, thus, advertising revenue.  Viacom was, in turn, losing online audience and potential revenue.  It saw itself, legitimately in my mind, as a content provider for YouTube, without receiving compensation.

YouTube immediately began scouring its databases and removing copyrighted video from Viacom. But considering the amount of videos that are uploaded - every hour on the clock, 780 hours of video are sent to YouTube’s servers - the task of finding and identifying copyrighted material is daunting.  A lot can get by the YouTube’s regulators, so to speak.

So the lawsuit stayed, with Viacom demanding access to YouTube’s database of user info.  The database is larger that that of the Library of Congress mind you.

YouTube’s database essentially contains four pieces of info:  the user’s unique login ID, their IP address, the time frame that the video was watched, and the video itself.  Usually, a login ID and an IP address can’t be used to identify an individual, but “usually” is a very inexact word.

Viacom is saying that they aren’t doing this to go after individuals.  They’re not doing this to nail someone who uploaded last night’s The Daily Show.  I believe them, at least for now.  But that doesn’t mean that they keep to that forever.

It makes no sense for them to try to use this data to sue people who have been uploading copyrighted videos at this juncture.  The ‘YouTube culture’ is one that has permitted this to happen and Viacom needs to work to change that culture over a year or two.

Viacom is saying that it wants to gauge the popularity of its copyrighted material.  Again, that makes sense.  We are talking revenue generating material that, while on YouTube, ins not directly generating measurable video.

There is some good news here.  Google, while not appealing, has asked Viacom to give them time to erase user names and IP addresses.  Viacom is open to the idea.

That’s great.  But that’s only this case.   You can be that this is opening a can of worms.

I’ll be investigating this further.  Stay tuned.

So I figured I’d check out this new site called TriviaOnNet.com. It’s made by Trivya and it’s addictive in a fun way. It’s sort of like an online game show where you got a limited amount of seconds to answer topical trivia questions. Get the most right, you win. They call this type of gaming casual gaming.

Playing trivia on the web is pretty cool but the real magic happens when you play it from within Facebook with the Trivya Facebook Application. And, when you sign up, Trivya spots you $5. And, once you get going and getting your boat legs, you’re eligible to sign up for the $10,000 trivia tournament this March.

When I played, the subject I’ve picked is sports and I’m doing somewhat well. But not evidently well enough because I keep coming in second. Or third… But you should check it out because I am sure you’re do better than me.  Both TriviaOnNet.com and the Trivya Facebook Application have the categories of sports, entertainment, and music. You can play for free - which I recommend for people starting out. Or you can pay and play and get paid — win!

They’ve come up with 500,000 questions. That’s right. Half a million. I remember Trivial Pursuit from the 1980’s and if you played enough, you’d start to get the same questions twice. Not with TriviaOnNet. That makes it that much better.

Now I just have to find a way to win.

Business student Andrew Houshian of the University of Texas at Austin’s McCombs School of Business sent us some questions, asking us how we like Google Apps. We have been hankering to answer this question publicly, so here we go!

Read more…

Being able to watch a collection of different commercials in one place is something that the general public has definitely been looking forward to having the ability to do. This day and age, commercials are not only advertising tools, but a part of pop culture as well.

Look at how many people watch the Super Bowl every year just to see which company comes up with the best commercial/advertising campaign. This desire for “desirable advertising” is something that the newly established Firebrand (beta.firebrand.com), an AHLLC client, has been able to capitalize on — check out the Firebrand TV Facebook group for up-to-the minute news.

Read more…

One of the newest AHLLC clients, thanks to our direct client, crayon, is ooVoo, a startup videoconferencing and instant messaging application that is providing users with a couple more options than its competitors.

In this day and age, people are always looking for the next best thing, or the new cutting edge features ooVoo allows video chats with up to 6 participants in real time, and unlike its biggest competitor Skype Video, does not use a P2P network. Like IM, you can send text messages and files.

Read more…