APCO Worldwide and the Council of Public Relations Firms just released a study on the similarities and differences on how public relations executives and bloggers view blogger relations. It confirms common sense, but it also shows me that common sense is not always applied.

The first thing that jumps out to me is that 52% of PR execs think that they and/or their firms do a good job reaching out to bloggers, while 65% of blogger felt otherwise. That means that, essentially, two-thirds of bloggers believe that PR efforts are poor.

This is important for what it says and for what it doesn’t say.

First of all, it means to me that we, as an industry are at least partially failing to effectively create best practices. There are probably too many haphazard efforts that are designed for mass exposure - meaning no effective targeting. And pitches may often empty of any relevance or filled with a false sense of camaraderie. And this probably occurs because a firm gets a client and off they go promoting.

In defense of agencies, however, it’s hard to see how it often could be that much different at times. While I agree PR practitioners should familiarize themselves with a blogger’s subject matter and style, it is impossible to do it on such a large scale. There are no Bacon’s or Cision’s media guide to work off. And clients often want results fast.

This is not to excuse the practice. It means that we in the profession must constantly seek to create methodologies that work for both the client and the blogger. I also see a potential business opportunity here for online directories to enhance their listings and perhaps charge a fee for a higher level of service.

Nevertheless, that gap is too large and the 65% of dissatisfied bloggers is abhorrently high. This brings me to a second point because the study points out that 63% of the bloggers surveyed that they get pitched at least once per week, 42% get pitched once per day, and 27% get pitched more than once per day. I talked to Matt Shaw, the Vice President of the Council of Public Relations Firms to clarify who these bloggers are. Essentially, they were approximately 400 “top” bloggers who responded to their survey.

Now we’re talking. Because it’s those A-List bloggers who are key here. Because they have the ability to make or break this whole blogger relations phenomenon. They’re the ones that are going to be getting pitched to more often - often as we see as being more than once a day.

Part of the problem is seen in the further findings by the study. Only 36% of PR execs agreed with the statement that “Bloggers are journalists and should be treated as such”, yet 62% of these execs nevertheless agreed with the statement “PR firms should reach out to bloggers essentially the same way we do to traditional media.”

This shows me two things. One is that the ways we reach out to traditional media are entirely adequate as methods that can be transferred to reaching out to bloggers. And/or it could mean that PR execs have yet to come to terms as to what the hell bloggers really are in the first place.

I suspect it’s both. Often, an honest respectful engagement can win over a reporter as it can a blogger. But sometimes it can’t . Bloggers themselves often don’t have any standards. They got into blogging and had no idea that they would soon get pitched on an almost daily basis. And what at first may have been flattering has now become annoying.

More on this study to follow…

I recently got to thinking about the article Chip Griffin wrote last month in MediaBistro. It was called “Throwing Out the Social Media Rulebook” and it created quite a stir. Some even got a little hostile.

I agree with all he wrote in that some in this open environment are creating certain rules suddenly come about that many say we must adhere to. Often by the most strident voices. But some of those same voices, while strident, make sense.

One of Chip’s points caught my eye. Actually they all did, but this one in particular:

Read more…

I just read Chris’ post on the recent relevation on techPresident that Hillary Clinton staffers - be they volunteers or paid - were just caught astroturfing a blog. I agree wholeheatedly with his comments, but…

This is politics and stuff like this will be the tip of the iceberg. Some likely low level Clintonites let their enthusiasm get to them. In reading the article I felt that the infraction was relatively benign. About four staffers consecutively registered and commented on the liberal blog Blue Hampshire via a computer whose IP address was registered to the Clinton campaign. They used nicknames for identification and personal emails for their contact info. Their comments were in support of this post.

In response, a spokesperson from the Clinton campaign said, “this was not an orchestrated effort but the product of over-eager staffers and volunteers.” Which was followed by “this was not an orchestrated effort but the product of over-eager staffers and volunteers, done without her awareness, and that it will not be repeated.”

My guess is that the spokesperson is exactly right with exception of the last part. It will be repeated and repeated and repeated. In two ways.

One is that it’s my guess that most over-eager staffers and volunteers have very little understanding or concern about the standards and ethics that have been set. They’re clueless (and sometimes in politics the clueless can also be ruthless). My guess is that these people meant no harm. They are basically minor league baseball players that get stuck taking steroids. But that means that there’s a bigger problem. Because when you get caught, you’re in trouble. Not being transparent means deceit.

This leads to what I expect the second way I believe this type of transgression will be repeated. I’d bet money that the campaigns are looking at ways to denigrate and destroy the opposition via social networks and blogging. There will be the creation of fake blogs that spread false rumors (such as Barack Obama is a Muslim) and other nefarious blurbs out there. Some will work. Others won’t. Some will get away with it. Others won’t. At least not right away. But eventually the lack of transparency will lead to the ultimate truth. Just like it did with steroids in baseball. Just ask Roger Clemens.

It’s coming to a campaign near you.

Just read on Mack Collier’s blog that, as of yesterday, the Blog Council was formed. It it’s going to involve executives and bloggers at larger companies to talk the talk about best practices re corporate blogging. It’s needed. And it shows that they seriously value blogging.

This is how they describe themselves:

The Blog Council is a community for official corporate blogs and bloggers that represent major global corporations.

Our mission is to address the unique needs of blogging in a corporate environment.

The Blog Council exists as a forum for executives to meet, share tactics and advice, and develop best practices. In its public role, the organization acts as a strong advocate in support of responsible, ethics-based corporate blogging.

Now this group is limited to ‘large’ corporations. That’s something that could end up being elitist. Or it could end up being something that trickles down. Only time will tell.

Behind it is Andy Sernowitz, a guy who seems to have a hand in everything and one of the founders of WOMMA.

I really love Wordpress, both as the blogging software platform upon which we built Marketing Conversation and as the the free, powerful, and hosted alternative to Blogger’s Blogspot. I like it so much that I actually created a 45-minute video. Enjoy!


Read more…