F.T.C. says bloggers need to do what good bloggers already do

by Phillip Rhoades on October 7, 2009 · 3 comments

There’s a lot of buzz about the new advertising disclosure regulations the F.T.C is putting into effect on December 1st.

Tim Arango over at The New York Times says in Soon, Bloggers Must Give Full Disclosure.

The F.T.C. said that beginning on Dec. 1, bloggers who review products must disclose any connection with advertisers, including, in most cases, the receipt of free products and whether or not they were paid in any way by advertisers, as occurs frequently. The new rules also take aim at celebrities, who will now need to disclose any ties to companies, should they promote products on a talk show or on Twitter. A second major change, which was not aimed specifically at bloggers or social media, was to eliminate the ability of advertisers to gush about results that differ from what is typical — for instance, from a weight loss supplement.

And David Gelles over at Financial Times says in Celebrities face crackdown with new rules on product endorsement

The new rules covering the use of testimonials in advertising, released by the Federal Trade Commission yesterday, say that anyone who endorses a product, whether celebrities or bloggers, must make explicit the compensation received from companies. This rule will affect everyone from film stars who receive free products in return for endorsements and bloggers.

The truth is, responsible and honest bloggers have been disclosing the fact they they’ve received free gifts or payments since the beginning. Now it’s regulated and that of course will be a bumpy ride, but certainly nothing crippling to the blogging community.

What do you think? Is F.T.C. regulation really needed? Has the F.T.C. gone too far? Not far enough?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Share on Tumblr

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Josh Peters 10.07.09 at 4:59 am

I think the $11k fee is a bit steep but maybe it will cause people to take it serious. I think it’s obviously needed because the lack of it was being abused by unscrupulous people. The bottom line is that good, honest, bloggers have nothing to fear from this and the only ones being affected by it are the ones who are trying to hide something or not being as forthcoming as they should. To me, it’s really no big deal.

2 Chris Abraham 10.08.09 at 12:28 pm

Lots of people have discussed that this ruling is an attack on free speech and essentially was designed to protect stupid people from themselves.

3 Phillip Rhoades 10.09.09 at 2:02 am

FTC assistant director Richard Cleland tells PRNewser that even the $16,000 number doesn’t apply. “It doesn’t matter whether it’s $16,000 or $11,000. The root problem here is that reports that there is a monetary penalty for violating these guidelines is untrue. The FTC does not have the authority to impose a fine for a violation to the FTC act,” says Cleland who heads the FTC’s division of advertising practices. “There is a provision that allows for a proceeding in federal court that allows for imposing of a monetary penalty for violation of trade regulation laws. The guidelines are not trade regulation laws.”

from F.T.C. Clarifies Guidlines. . . – Joe Ciarallo

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Previous post:

Next post: