<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some tips if you&#8217;re going to use online video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingconversation.com/2009/07/15/some-tips-if-youre-going-to-use-online-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2009/07/15/some-tips-if-youre-going-to-use-online-video/</link>
	<description>Digital PR and Social Media Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Nunn</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2009/07/15/some-tips-if-youre-going-to-use-online-video/comment-page-1/#comment-5512</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Nunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/?p=3718#comment-5512</guid>
		<description>Great tips.

I often hear people brag about how little they spent, or the rawness of their production qualities for video content used on a corporate website, as if the alternative was a Hollywood film production budget. I agree that video is a more engaging medium for most people, and therefore an affective way to communicate visual content. That said, you need to align your production values with quality levels that reflect on your brand or corporate reputation.

If I was producing video content for a bank, I would sure as heck make sure my video production quality was pretty good. If I was producing content for a skateboard  manufacturer, I could skimp a bit for effect. If the content was non-visual, such as review of financial statements, I would nix the video. 

Video content isn&#039;t a &quot;one size fits all&quot; proposition. For companies that understand the video medium, it can drive traffic and engagement very effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips.</p>
<p>I often hear people brag about how little they spent, or the rawness of their production qualities for video content used on a corporate website, as if the alternative was a Hollywood film production budget. I agree that video is a more engaging medium for most people, and therefore an affective way to communicate visual content. That said, you need to align your production values with quality levels that reflect on your brand or corporate reputation.</p>
<p>If I was producing video content for a bank, I would sure as heck make sure my video production quality was pretty good. If I was producing content for a skateboard  manufacturer, I could skimp a bit for effect. If the content was non-visual, such as review of financial statements, I would nix the video. </p>
<p>Video content isn&#8217;t a &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; proposition. For companies that understand the video medium, it can drive traffic and engagement very effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/23 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 447/475 objects using disk: basic

Served from: marketingconversation.com @ 2012-05-24 18:21:33 -->
