<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Is What Second Life Wasn&#8217;t: Light, Cheap and Open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingconversation.com/2009/06/27/twitter-is-what-second-life-wasnt-light-cheap-and-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2009/06/27/twitter-is-what-second-life-wasnt-light-cheap-and-open/</link>
	<description>Digital PR and Social Media Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abraham</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2009/06/27/twitter-is-what-second-life-wasnt-light-cheap-and-open/comment-page-1/#comment-5413</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/?p=3652#comment-5413</guid>
		<description>Are there still loads of brands like Coke and Old Navy and so forth on Second Life?  How is my description of Second Life wrong?  Well, anyway, I never said that my anything is objective because I am a blogger so my everything is SUBjective, and so there we go.  The comparison is not unappropriate [sic] either -- I was just comparing hypes -- people were comparing the current popularity trend of Twitter to the ascent of Second Life and I was just saying that they are suffering from different hypes -- I was comparing their successes, their hype, and their potential for brand failure -- which is what everyone but you thinks has happened to Second Life: fail whale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there still loads of brands like Coke and Old Navy and so forth on Second Life?  How is my description of Second Life wrong?  Well, anyway, I never said that my anything is objective because I am a blogger so my everything is SUBjective, and so there we go.  The comparison is not unappropriate [sic] either &#8212; I was just comparing hypes &#8212; people were comparing the current popularity trend of Twitter to the ascent of Second Life and I was just saying that they are suffering from different hypes &#8212; I was comparing their successes, their hype, and their potential for brand failure &#8212; which is what everyone but you thinks has happened to Second Life: fail whale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opensource Obscure</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2009/06/27/twitter-is-what-second-life-wasnt-light-cheap-and-open/comment-page-1/#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>Opensource Obscure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/?p=3652#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>Even if this description of Second Life was objective, realistic and correct (and it&#039;s not), the comparison between a microblogging system and a virtual world platform is deeply unappropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if this description of Second Life was objective, realistic and correct (and it&#8217;s not), the comparison between a microblogging system and a virtual world platform is deeply unappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/11 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 462/464 objects using disk: basic

Served from: marketingconversation.com @ 2012-05-24 17:54:52 -->
