Social media will transcend the negative aspects of the recesson

by Jonathan Trenn on October 26, 2008 · 4 comments

Let’s face it, we’re in a recession. In the past five weeks, the stock market has tanked, the credit market has dried up, and a very large rescue/bailout plan has seemingly had little effect. Companies are now cutting back and employees are being let go.

Usually, the first cut in a recession is personnel, followed closely by the marketing budget. And no matter how much marketers will protest, no matter how many case studies and white papers we can produce showing that cutting marketing is the exact wrong thing to do, CFO’s and other decision makers bring out their scalpels and/or machetes. No doubt this time will be different.

This post is going to be a call out to decision makers, both financial and marketing, to take a close look at social media adoption as a means to keep a competitive edge and how your organization could be damaged or at the very least miss significant marketing opportunities and to address problematic issues. Social media is a whole new ballgame because it covers so much – marketing, customer relations, media relations, public relations, and a whole lot more. And much of it is not controlled by the organization. With your initiatives, you remain somewhat in control – although not as much as you think or you’d like. But social media is now effecting your brand(s), your status within your category, your organization as a whole. That’s because much of social media is initiated and, thus, managed and controlled by outside influencers.

It is you that has to adapt to this new age. You may not understand it at this point. You may have never knowingly read a blog, and you may declare you have no interest in doing so. You may think company names (Google, Twitter, etc.) sound silly, Therefore, you may feel that all of this is unimportant. If you feel that way, you’re wrong. That’s because this isn’t all about you. It is about the way we are all communicating, learning, and exchanging ideas. It’s about how we are now being marketed to. Take the time to learn it. No excuses.

Forrester Research just released a study showing how the use of social media is growing among online adults in the US. What’s also telling is that it’s not just the numbers that are increasing, it is that the types of involvement reflect a deeper involvement by those that use it. If the internet allows greater interaction between user and others, then social media is the engine that drives it. And a solid majority of adults are hopping the drivers seat.

People are searching for information on products and services. They’re going to review sites. They may be blogging about your new line of products, the restaurant you own, the quality of your service. It may be direct comments or it may be part of an overall presentation someone has left.

Forrester found that, in 2008, only 25% of online adults are “inactives” when it comes to social media. The other 75% use social media -whether they know it or not – to express their views,feelings, and concerns. And 21% – just over 1 in 5, are now considered to be “creators”. People who publish blogs, write stories, and upload videos. That means millions of people are now taking time out of their lives to create, produce, and distribute content.

The above graphic show us the hierarchy of user involvement. Forrester reports that the largest group, not surprisingly, is “spectators” at 69% of users. Note that these groups overlap. This means that effectively 7 out of 10 online adults may well be conducting research on whatever is you produce or provide. Right off the bat, you should think of search engine marketing (SEM). But you also should realize that this means that these same people aren’t just using, say, Google, to find your website…they’re also headed over to online review sites to see what others are saying about you. They’re reading (and in many cases contributing to) online forums that talk directly or indirectly about you. And your competitors.

Here’s another graph that breaks down the percentage of each category amongst the online population:

Take note of the critics. Thirty seven percent are writing those reviews, commenting on forums and blogs…they’re getting involved. They are one step away from being creators. They are proof that our culture has changed. That, whether or not you understand it or not, your likely customer base is going online and “doing” social media to get info about you.

This means that regardless of whether or not there is a recession, regardless of whether or not you understand all of this, you need to develop a social media strategy to address the needs of your customers, to market and to promote. To engage.

The fact we’re going to be in a recession does not mean that we’re not going to stop getting involved with social media. And the reality is that that fact that many decision makers don’t see this quite yet will do nothing to slow it down.

{ 4 comments }

1 Bobby 10.26.08 at 10:43 pm

Good post. However, if, as you have predicted, corporations will look to cut marketing budgets, will they make the investment to learn and adopt social media – an (as you have said in a past entry) “largely unproven” tool?

Surely business will want to make decisions based on “hard” data and “proven” approaches in uncertain times? I’m not saying it’s the right or wrong thing to do, just an observation.

2 Jonathan Trenn 10.26.08 at 11:11 pm

Bobby

First of all, thanks for remembering some of my past posts!!

Great question. I’m thinking that online overall will become more and more prominent in the minds of marketers and traditional will get hit the hardest.

So what will happen is that companies will start to “listen” more and more. Meaning pay attention to what’s being said about them online. And then from that info, they’ll learn how they should end up marketing to these target audiences.

That may not entail huge initiatives. It could be targeted efforts to different types of customers as those different types of customers use digital arena differently.

Many traditional types of marketing can’t really get that “hard” data, making a weaker case for their continued dominance.

3 Bobby 10.28.08 at 11:31 pm

Thanks Jonathon,

I see where you are coming from. I guess with traditional potentially getting hit the hardest, online is a very cost effective way to market (if approached correctly).

I definitely agree that companies will need to listen more. However, despite the lack of ‘hard’ data in any case (evaluation is one of the oft argued areas of communication!) traditional types of marketing are still perceived as that – traditional, cemented, “proven”. I’m guessing there are many rigid executives out there who won’t jump into something they aren’t sure about (i.e. online).

I think you’re right though – traditional will get hit hard and an investment in online could really be just a case of ’short term pain for long term gain’.

4 Adam Henige 10.30.08 at 3:40 am

This couldn’t be more poignant, as my recent experiences showed. This past week Google rolled out new beta features in Google Analytics with a lot of fanfare (addressing many criticisms which I had recently documented in my blog, coincidentally). As someone who implements A LOT of Google Analytics for clients, I was really miffed at how limited the rollout was as I didn’t have access to the new features in any of my accounts.

Of course, I made this known on my personal blog and also on a couple other industry blogs.

To my amazement, someone at Google came across my groveling and emailed me personally and had me added to the program. From the buzz I’ve picked up, I’m not alone here. A very proactive, over the top customer-centric move by some of these folks at Google.

Appeasing some influential industry professionals via their approach to social media is unquestionably a wise move from a reputation standpoint. Regardless of budget cuts, any company would do themselves well to immerse themselves in social media.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: