Marketing Has Better Numbers But PR Has Better Metrics

by Chris Abraham on January 28, 2008

Post to Twitter

The most challenging thing Mark and I deal with on a day-to-day is measurements: metrics, numbers, penetration, impact, and influence. Whenever I look at the sort of numbers that advertising and marketing offer I am generally amazed. Every day we’re learning more and more on how to convey our constant success to the client without setting off our bullshit alarm. Katie Paine offers some great information in this regard in her post PR might be better at measurement than marketing. Via KDPaine’s PR Measurement Blog:

For years, PR has been considered much less measurable than marketing, but now it seems that the tides have turned. I have PR clients that can absolutely tell you the impact that THEIR efforts have on consumer behavior. Facebook  can track specific PR initiatives to increased user signups — their most recent sponsorship of the pre-NH primary debate resulted in 1,000,000 sign ups. Similarly, the ASPCA knows exactly which type of news generates the most new members and on-line donations. Never mind the work that Procter & Gamble has done to tie its PR efforts to increased sales.


Share on Tumblr

Post to Twitter

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Reader January 31, 2008 at 10:18 am

Leave a Comment

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Previous post:

Next post: