<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t Step Into the Same RSS River Twice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/</link>
	<description>Digital PR and Social Media Marketing by Abraham Harrison LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Harrison</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Well, there are two types of RSS readers: analysts who have the time and the interest to do the RSS news equiv of an EKG; however, most people just need alerts, need updates, and need to take a pulse.

So, it is a constant state of now, now, now.

An, actually, I hate to contradict you, Tony, but it isn&#039;t Particls that is choosing the content and the news, it is you... you as manifest by your APML file.

People who dig Particls were the same people who had a scanner and listened for police alerts and so forth -- it is the kind of person who care about the Zeitgeist and not every single thing coming and going.

I am like you, Tony.  I save all of my news papers -- NYT, WSJ, and the FT, and pore over the ones I couldn&#039;t keep up with at the end of the week; however, to most people, what&#039;s happening now (market, news, business, etc) is what matters.

In the news, and in a 24-hour cycle, there is a 3-4 hour time out towards obsolescence. 

I read Google Reader to get EVERYTHING, but I use Particles to keep track of all the news from my staggering 1,000+ feeds that I very well might have forwarded myself.

Is Particls Enterprise 2.0-ready?  I don&#039;t know. Are companies ready to lose a little to gain a lot? Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there are two types of RSS readers: analysts who have the time and the interest to do the RSS news equiv of an EKG; however, most people just need alerts, need updates, and need to take a pulse.</p>
<p>So, it is a constant state of now, now, now.</p>
<p>An, actually, I hate to contradict you, Tony, but it isn&#8217;t Particls that is choosing the content and the news, it is you&#8230; you as manifest by your APML file.</p>
<p>People who dig Particls were the same people who had a scanner and listened for police alerts and so forth &#8212; it is the kind of person who care about the Zeitgeist and not every single thing coming and going.</p>
<p>I am like you, Tony.  I save all of my news papers &#8212; NYT, WSJ, and the FT, and pore over the ones I couldn&#8217;t keep up with at the end of the week; however, to most people, what&#8217;s happening now (market, news, business, etc) is what matters.</p>
<p>In the news, and in a 24-hour cycle, there is a 3-4 hour time out towards obsolescence. </p>
<p>I read Google Reader to get EVERYTHING, but I use Particles to keep track of all the news from my staggering 1,000+ feeds that I very well might have forwarded myself.</p>
<p>Is Particls Enterprise 2.0-ready?  I don&#8217;t know. Are companies ready to lose a little to gain a lot? Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Particls is Buddhist?  No.  Particls is software.  Ego only hinders usable software, and in this case, I have to agree with Attensa.  A feed reader is about having information when I want it, not when the software wants me to have it.  It&#039;s OK to assume a missed article might no longer be relevant, but ultimately it is I who should decide that, not the application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Particls is Buddhist?  No.  Particls is software.  Ego only hinders usable software, and in this case, I have to agree with Attensa.  A feed reader is about having information when I want it, not when the software wants me to have it.  It&#8217;s OK to assume a missed article might no longer be relevant, but ultimately it is I who should decide that, not the application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abraham - Because the Medium is the Message</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abraham - Because the Medium is the Message</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You Can’t Step Into the Same RSS River Twice&lt;/strong&gt;

I just posted a new comment onto the Attensa blog after I reread a blog post reviewing Particls, the coolest desktop news gadget I have seen, &quot;The tool that is supposed to focus your attention ends up being a distraction....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You Can’t Step Into the Same RSS River Twice</strong></p>
<p>I just posted a new comment onto the Attensa blog after I reread a blog post reviewing Particls, the coolest desktop news gadget I have seen, &#8220;The tool that is supposed to focus your attention ends up being a distraction&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Harrison</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>Oh, also, I was not aware that Particls was that polite.  Particls is like having an information valet(tm), a news valet(tm). ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, also, I was not aware that Particls was that polite.  Particls is like having an information valet(tm), a news valet(tm). ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Harrison</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Shhhh, Chris, don&#039;t let it get out that I am smart or anything like that. People *hate* the smart kid. I will start getting wedgies and noogies. Worse, I will never get picked first for Dodgeball during PhysEd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shhhh, Chris, don&#8217;t let it get out that I am smart or anything like that. People *hate* the smart kid. I will start getting wedgies and noogies. Worse, I will never get picked first for Dodgeball during PhysEd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Saad</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Chris - you hit the nail on the head.

And also Particls even takes into account when the user is away. When it notices that the user is away, items expire more slowly so chances are you will still see what happened during the day.

Particls will also que up the popup alerts until you come back to your desk.

As you say - the goal of Particls is to display a zen-like stream of news headlines. Stay informed while being productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; you hit the nail on the head.</p>
<p>And also Particls even takes into account when the user is away. When it notices that the user is away, items expire more slowly so chances are you will still see what happened during the day.</p>
<p>Particls will also que up the popup alerts until you come back to your desk.</p>
<p>As you say &#8211; the goal of Particls is to display a zen-like stream of news headlines. Stay informed while being productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Johnson</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/13/you-cant-step-into-the-same-rss-river-twice/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>...as long as the &quot;stuff&quot; is always running downstream, that&#039;s probably a very safe river...

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;as long as the &#8220;stuff&#8221; is always running downstream, that&#8217;s probably a very safe river&#8230;</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
