<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugg 2.0 by Treehugger Re-Launched Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/</link>
	<description>Digital PR and Social Media Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abraham - Because the Medium is the Message</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abraham - Because the Medium is the Message</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hugg 2.0 by Treehugger Re-Launched Today&lt;/strong&gt;

Via email and on the Hugg site, &quot;And surprise! We&#039;ve changed Hugg. In response to some pressing technical issues, the Hugg 2.0 roll-out is happening a bit sooner than we&#039;d initially scheduled it, so let us know if you&#039;re seeing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hugg 2.0 by Treehugger Re-Launched Today</strong></p>
<p>Via email and on the Hugg site, &#8220;And surprise! We&#8217;ve changed Hugg. In response to some pressing technical issues, the Hugg 2.0 roll-out is happening a bit sooner than we&#8217;d initially scheduled it, so let us know if you&#8217;re seeing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Harrison</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/#comment-609</guid>
		<description>I was hacking around in Hugg and Hugg is pretty much just an off-the-shelf installation of Drupal with a little bit of skinning and some template work. So, lots of this look and feel can change, if they were able to get a truly great CSS goddess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hacking around in Hugg and Hugg is pretty much just an off-the-shelf installation of Drupal with a little bit of skinning and some template work. So, lots of this look and feel can change, if they were able to get a truly great CSS goddess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingconversation.com/2007/08/03/hugg-20-by-treehugger-re-launched-today/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>I hope I&#039;m not being overly critical, but it seems to me that environmental and nature organizations that sell themselves based on a web 2.0 look sacrifice too much.  First, you sacrifice the beauty of natural design.  Second, you sacrifice your branding.  You aren&#039;t a web 2.0 organization...you are an environmental organization.  Or at least a media organization interested in covering the environment.  

I think the look is anything but natural--especially given the color scheme.   The green they picked it both too light and too brown.  So, a more appealing shade of green would have been nice.  For instance eithe of the 2 greens you have on your page are great!

At the end of the day its about functionality.  Just my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I&#8217;m not being overly critical, but it seems to me that environmental and nature organizations that sell themselves based on a web 2.0 look sacrifice too much.  First, you sacrifice the beauty of natural design.  Second, you sacrifice your branding.  You aren&#8217;t a web 2.0 organization&#8230;you are an environmental organization.  Or at least a media organization interested in covering the environment.  </p>
<p>I think the look is anything but natural&#8211;especially given the color scheme.   The green they picked it both too light and too brown.  So, a more appealing shade of green would have been nice.  For instance eithe of the 2 greens you have on your page are great!</p>
<p>At the end of the day its about functionality.  Just my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/12 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 477/479 objects using disk: basic

Served from: marketingconversation.com @ 2012-05-22 19:47:59 -->
